Process Systems, LLC
Data/AI Dedicated Power and Cooling

Presentation 1 · Process Systems, LLC & Dylan Energy CHP

Co-Generation Power and Cooling for AI/Data Center

A strategic and technical overview of the Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power (CCHP) platform — engineered for next-generation AI infrastructure.

70–85%
Total System Efficiency
vs. 30–40% conventional
700 tons
Cooling per 1 MW Module
Absorption chiller
3–6 yrs
Investment Payback
Full system ROI
1–100 MW
Modular Scalability
Pilot to campus scale
01

Executive Overview and Strategic Context

Why Integrated Power and Cooling Is a Board-Level Priority

AI data centers face critical limits from separate power and cooling systems — causing inefficiencies, high costs, and infrastructure bottlenecks. As compute density continues to rise, the need for a unified energy architecture has become a strategic imperative, not just an engineering preference.

Challenges in Data Center Power and Cooling

Separate power and cooling systems create inefficiencies and high costs that scale with AI workload growth. Conventional approaches cannot keep pace with rising power density.

Integrated CCHP System Benefits

The Combined Cooling, Heat, and Power system unifies power and cooling into a single cascading energy flow, optimizing fuel use and dramatically reducing waste.

Executive Strategic Value

Integrated systems improve efficiency to 70–85%, lower emissions, and enable modular deployment for faster market readiness and lower capital risk.

02

System Architecture and Energy Flow

The radiation-integrated CCHP platform replaces three separate systems — power generation, backup generation, and mechanical cooling — with a single unified cascading energy architecture. Each stage of the energy flow feeds the next, eliminating waste at every step.

Radiation-Dominant Steam Generation

High-temperature combustion optimizes radiant heat transfer, enhancing efficiency far beyond conventional convection-only methods.

Steam Turbine Power Conversion

Steam at 120 psig and 350°F drives an industrial turbine converting 20–25% of thermal energy to electrical power using proven, commercially available equipment.

Absorption Chiller Cooling Cycle

Turbine exhaust steam powers an absorption chiller, producing chilled water for data center cooling — turning waste heat into high-value cooling capacity.

Unified Cascading Energy System

Integrated design replaces separate assets, enabling simplified control, optimization, and minimal energy waste across the entire system.

03

Radiation-Integrated Steam Generation

Why Radiation-Dominant Heat Transfer Changes the Economics

At high combustion temperatures, radiation heat transfer scales with the fourth power of absolute temperature (Stefan–Boltzmann T⁴ law). This means small increases in flame and refractory temperature produce dramatically larger increases in heat flux — fundamentally changing the economics of steam generation.

This represents a fundamental shift in heat transfer physics application — delivering major performance and economic gains that convection-only designs simply cannot match.

Key Economic Impact

Reduces burner duty by up to 90%
Lowers fuel consumption and operating costs
Cuts NOₓ and CO₂ emissions significantly
Enables smaller, lower-cost burner equipment
04

Steam Turbine Power Generation

The platform uses commercially available steam turbines without modification — ensuring reliable, proven technology with established supply chains and service networks. No exotic equipment, no proprietary lock-in.

Standard Steam Conditions

Steam meets typical inlet requirements around 120 psig and 350°F saturated conditions for mid-megawatt applications — compatible with off-the-shelf industrial turbines.

Lower Cost and Emissions

The innovative steam generation method reduces fuel input, cost, and emissions compared to traditional boilers — without sacrificing turbine compatibility.

Energy Efficiency and Recovery

Approximately 22% of thermal input converts to electricity, with exhaust steam suitable for downstream thermal recovery in the absorption cooling stage.

05

Absorption Cooling Integration

Turning Turbine Exhaust into High-Value Cooling

Rather than discarding turbine exhaust steam as waste heat, the CCHP platform routes it directly into an absorption chiller. This converts what would otherwise be lost energy into approximately 700 tons of cooling per 1 MW module — at a coefficient of performance (COP) of around 0.7.

For AI data centers, this is transformative: cooling capacity scales directly with power output, eliminating the need for separate electrical chillers and reducing peak electrical demand charges.

1 MW Module — Cooling Performance

Exhaust Heat Recovered12 MMBtu/hr
Cooling Output~700 tons
COP (Coefficient of Performance)~0.7
Chiller TypeAbsorption Chiller
06

Performance Metrics by Deployment Size

The modular architecture allows deployment at any scale — from a 1 MW pilot validating the technology to a 100 MW campus installation. Each module is independently operable, enabling incremental capacity growth aligned with capital expenditure cycles.

Module Performance Summary

ModuleThermal InputCoolingBest For
1 MW15.5 MMBtu/hr700 tonsPilot / edge data centers
5 MW75–80 MMBtu/hr3,500 tonsEarly commercial projects
10 MW~155 MMBtu/hr7,000 tonsCommercial / campus
100 MWReplicated modules70,000 tonsLarge campus deployments
07

Efficiency Comparison

Why Total Efficiency Matters More Than Electrical Efficiency Alone

Conventional power systems — diesel generators, gas turbines — are typically evaluated on electrical efficiency alone (30–40%). This metric ignores the enormous amount of energy discarded as waste heat. The CCHP platform captures that waste heat and converts it into useful cooling, achieving 70–85% total system efficiency.

30–40%
Conventional Systems
Electrical efficiency only
70–85%
CCHP Platform
Total system efficiency

Impact on Costs and Emissions

Higher total efficiency reduces fuel consumption, lowers operating costs, and cuts emissions — supporting both financial and sustainability goals.

Strategic Advantage of Holistic Efficiency

Boards focused on competitiveness should prioritize total efficiency as a more accurate measure of system value than electrical efficiency alone.

08

Economic Impact

The economic case for the CCHP platform is compelling across multiple dimensions — fuel savings, eliminated electrical cooling demand, reduced capital duplication, and a 3–6 year payback period.

Fuel Consumption Reduction

Radiation-based steam generation cuts fuel use by up to 60% compared to convection-only systems — the single largest operating cost driver.

Absorption Cooling Benefits

Absorption cooling eliminates electrical demand from vapor-compression chillers, lowering energy costs and peak demand charges.

Integrated System Advantages

Combining power, backup, and cooling systems reduces capital duplication and lowers overall investment costs versus separate systems.

Financial Impact and ROI

The system offers payback in 3 to 6 years and improves long-term operating margins and cost stability for data center operators.

09

Data Center Applications

Meeting AI Data Center Power and Cooling Demand Simultaneously

AI data centers present a unique challenge: power and cooling demands rise simultaneously and in direct proportion to each other. The CCHP platform is purpose-built for this relationship — a single fuel input supplies both power and cooling, with cooling capacity automatically scaling with power output.

Parallel Power and Cooling Demand

AI workloads drive rising power and cooling needs that increase simultaneously — making integrated solutions far more efficient than separate systems.

Operational Advantages

On-site modular units avoid grid delays, reduce emergency generator reliance, and improve thermal management control for mission-critical operations.

Enhanced Resilience and Scalability

Chilled water from recovered heat links cooling capacity to power production, creating a self-reinforcing system with higher resilience and scalability.

10

Deployment Strategy

The phased deployment strategy is designed to mitigate technical and financial risk while preserving optionality at each stage. Capital expenditure aligns with validated performance, and each phase builds on the data and confidence generated by the previous one.

P1
Pilot Installation1–5 MW

Validates system integration and performance under real conditions. Provides crucial operational data and stakeholder confidence before larger commitments.

P2
Early Commercial Rollout5–10 MW

Expands deployment targeting facilities with immediate power and cooling needs. Leverages pilot learnings to accelerate commissioning.

P3
Campus-Level Scaling30–100 MW

Scales modular installations to full campus deployments, aligning capital expenditure with growth and enabling large-scale efficiency gains.

11

Conclusion and Recommendations

The radiation-integrated CCHP platform represents a fundamental advancement in data center energy infrastructure — combining proven industrial technologies in a novel cascading architecture that doubles total system efficiency while reducing fuel consumption, emissions, and capital costs.

Innovative Energy Integration

Combining radiation steam generation with industrial turbines and absorption cooling doubles total system efficiency versus conventional approaches.

Operational and Environmental Benefits

Higher efficiency reduces fuel consumption, operating costs, and emissions for sustainable, cost-competitive infrastructure.

Strategic Alignment with AI Needs

Platform supports high power density, large cooling demands, and rapid scalability critical for AI workloads at any scale.

Recommended Next Steps

Authorize pilot deployment (1–5 MW)
Conduct site evaluation and feasibility study
Pursue phased scale-up based on pilot results
Engage Process Systems, LLC for detailed engineering